More Reason Man United Fans To Hate Glazer
When the Glazers made a call to
take Man United public again most of the fans approved it. Many fans saw this as
the way to made Man United debts free again and the same time reducing the
Glazer control at Old Trafford.
When there was planned to float
Man United shares at Singapore Stock Exchange with aimed to raise USD1 billion, again it was most welcomed by the fans. The money from the IPO surely more than
enough to clear all the debts. The huge surplus could be used to sign more
world class players.
However the IPO in Singapore was
halted and cited the volatile market as the reason. Suddenly the Glazer
announced the IPO will be at US, their homeland. This time the IPO was aimed to
raise only USD 383 million by selling a 10.2% stake in the club. A lot of amount been reduced and this time
all debts cannot be cleared. This had raised a few eyebrows of many fans. Man
United said to have USD 650 million debts after the Glazer took over.
It angry more Man United fans
when IPO prospectus claimed only to benefit the higher power people in Man
United including Sir Alex Ferguson. From the IPO it was said that the Glazer had
reneged on their promise to use all the funds from a successful flotation to
reduce United’s debts. The new
plan under the IPO outline that the Glazer will use only USD 114.4 million of any proceeds
to reduce the debt, and "pocket a similar sum for themselves." If
demand for the IPO "proves high, the Glazers could receive" up to
USD216.7 million.
The plan also stated that under
the terms of the listing, the Glazers "will retain control of United
through their ownership of Class B shares, which will have 10 times the voting
power of the stock sold to the public."
This mean the Glazer
will pocket a lot of money, Man United still in huge debts and the best part is
they still control the club. They used others money to reduce debts but in same
time increasing their personal wealth.
But that not all. According to
the expert the Man United had the potential for scandal. Former U.S. Sen. Paul
Sarbanes who was the architect for famous Sarbanes-Oxley Act, said this when
been asked regarding Man United IPO. Sarbanes referring this to new Jobs Act
2012 that also governed in Man United
IPO. The funny thing was Man United listing was qualified as an
"emerging-growth company" under terms of the Jobs Act.
Meanwhile his friend Michael
Oxley ridiculed the IPO by saying "I read an article the other day where
Manchester United football team is considering an IPO here in the United
States. They are a startup company that has only been around 120 years."
US law under securities act
define "emerging-growth company" as means an issuer that had total annual gross revenues of less
than USD 1,000,000,000.
Oxley added "They're going
to start an IPO here, but all the jobs are going to be in the UK. That doesn't
strike me as job creating,"
Jobs Act 2012 is a law intended
to encourage funding of United States small
businesses by easing various securities regulations. It passed with
bipartisan support, and was signed into law by the President of the United
States on 5 April 2012. It is also aimed to increase American job creation and
economic growth by improving access to the public capital markets for emerging
growth companies.
So it is relatively easy to
understand what been stated above. No need to elaborate more about this.
Finally what the hell is going on
right now? Answers demanded.
No comments:
Post a Comment