tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6499564207342051228.post7243027877802701109..comments2023-08-23T18:47:54.302+08:00Comments on Anak Askar: Evra Shoe Off, Indirect Free Kick Or Notjanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16272386954296580767noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6499564207342051228.post-63940383846875767732013-02-26T02:51:13.078+08:002013-02-26T02:51:13.078+08:00not wearing both boots is not in the fifa laws of ...not wearing both boots is not in the fifa laws of the game handbook....made up rule by whoever posted itAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6499564207342051228.post-76510227275124852392012-03-14T02:35:58.129+08:002012-03-14T02:35:58.129+08:00"Anonymous said...
"FIFA laws state an i..."Anonymous said...<br />"FIFA laws state an indirect free-kick should be awarded against any player who touches the ball while not wearing both boots. If this correct than the referee was wrong. You can see that from the picture below that Evra still had one shoe on when he kick the ball."<br /><br />How was the referee wrong?<br /><br />An indirect free-kick should be awarded against any player who touches the ball WHILE NOT WEARING BOTH BOOTS.<br /><br />Evra still had one shoe on. ONE SHOW. Not _BOTH_"<br /><br />Thats why the ref is wrong.. because he gave a free kick agaisnt evra despite him only havin 1 shoe offAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6499564207342051228.post-91798578914349999532012-03-12T10:40:52.979+08:002012-03-12T10:40:52.979+08:00thank guys for the great infothank guys for the great infojanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16272386954296580767noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6499564207342051228.post-45045793935043140252012-03-10T06:33:05.081+08:002012-03-10T06:33:05.081+08:00"FIFA laws state an indirect free-kick should..."FIFA laws state an indirect free-kick should be awarded against any player who touches the ball while not wearing both boots. If this correct than the referee was wrong. You can see that from the picture below that Evra still had one shoe on when he kick the ball."<br /><br />How was the referee wrong?<br /><br />An indirect free-kick should be awarded against any player who touches the ball WHILE NOT WEARING BOTH BOOTS.<br /><br />Evra still had one shoe on. ONE SHOW. Not _BOTH_Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6499564207342051228.post-74782325716450054832012-03-09T22:48:10.944+08:002012-03-09T22:48:10.944+08:00under law 4:
Restarting of Play:
If play was sto...under law 4:<br /><br />Restarting of Play:<br /><br />If play was stopped to administer a caution: Restart with an indirect free-kick taken by a player of the opposing side, from the place where the ball was located when the Referee stopped the game.<br /><br />Common sense dictates that there is no need to stop play for a temporary accidental loss or misplacement of equipment, such as, footwear or shin-guards, or when re-tying boot laces.Andy Lnoreply@blogger.com